First, it looks like that story is on a Christian/church site.  I noted on their site that I think it's not the best choice to "flaunt" her flesh, even if they just wanted to show the reason.

You're right and they're right.  The New Zealanders were absolutely wrong for how they went about the situation.  Basically, it comes down to cowardice.  Instead of inviting her to the Casino Host office and having a friendly chat, they humiliated her.  They could have sent her to the apparel shop with a certificate for a shawl.  Instead, they have alienated MANY people, not just solved a problem.

On her end, although I DO UNDERSTAND about finding attractive evening wear that fits, she was wrong because her clothes are not modest enough.  I laugh as I write that, because I live near Atlantic City.  Those women sometimes fall right out of their dresses.  But anyway, I digress.  Another factor is that she is "fat" to many.  Stay with me.  Because she is not sexy, no one wants to see her undressed, so her breasts are deemed offensive.  It's like the girl who dresses like a tramp and giggles when the "cute" guys pinch her butt but then slaps the ugly guy who tries to get her phone number.

Sadly, we busty women have to choose large sizes and tailor the bodice.  Deep necklines are considered sexy on JLo and repulsive on Jane Dove (get it?).

Hopefully, the casino will apologize, send her a shawl in her size, and invite her back.

Bei